Two weeks ago an article appeared on Reuters.com about the
jury selection for the trial of an Islamic cleric, Abu
Hamza al-Masri, accused of plotting to start a militant base camp in the United
States. (Ax, 2014) I was struck by the
headline that referred to al-Masri as a “one-eyed, handless Islamic cleric.”
Robertson
(2013) argues that media outlets in the age of globalization hold a large
amount of power in framing our sense of “self” and “other”. In a shared global space, he says that the
media define the moral space and determine how the other should appear to us.
In doing so they seek to elicit a moral response from us.
The headline of the story portrays al-Masri as
monstrous. Juxtaposing the physical
description with his identity as an Islamic cleric seeks to associate a
monstrous appearance with a western perception of Islamic fanaticism. This is designed to elicit a moral response
from the audience based upon the particular frame.
Despite the widespread use of personal communication
technologies, large media outlets still possess large amounts of power and
influence. It is for this reason that
users and consumers of media must maintain a critical eye in order to see
through certain agendas and framing strategies and understand messages from a
more objective viewpoint.
References
Ax, J. (2014, April, 14). Jury Selected for U.S. Trial of
one-eyed, handless Islamic cleric. Retrieved from http://
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/14/us-usa-security-imam-idUSBREA3D11620140414
Robertson, A. (2013). Connecting in crisis: “Old” and “new”
media and the Arab Spring. International
Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 325-341.